One-click setup
Pick a standard (or scope) and a Process Library — every requirement in scope gets audited.
Framework Audits
Audit any standard against your QMS — at scale, on demand
Applied SAFe® Platform generates a rating, findings and supporting evidence for every requirement, so auditors review results instead of compiling them.
Objective
Run an automated audit of an entire standard — or a tailored scope — against a customer's Process Library.
Benefits
Hours instead of weeks. A full ISO 13485 or ASPICE audit completes in a single async run — auditors arrive to a finished report.
Grounded in your QMS. Every finding is anchored to a specific Process Library version, so audits stay traceable and reproducible.
Repeatable across cycles. Re-run the same audit against a new Process Library version to see exactly what shifted — no re-setup, no drift.
Features
Powered by the Process Knowledge Graph
Audit workers reason over the same graph of entities, relationships and community reports that powers the copilot.
Versioned audit reports
Every run becomes a new version — current and historical versions live side by side, never overwritten.
Runs at any size
Whether it is a 50-requirement scope or a full standard, audits run in the background and report progress live.
Framework Audits
One report, many sessions
Audits are not one-off events. Applied SAFe® Platform organizes them as a persistent report, built up incrementally.
All criteria of standardASPICE 3.1: 264 criteria
ACQ + MAN + PIMREUSPL + SUP + SWESYS
sessions#1#2#3#4#5Current report
Follow-up sessions
How to read this
- Each bar is one audit session.
- Bar height is the number of criteria assessed in that session.
- Bar position is which part of the full standard was assessed.
- The current report is the latest finding for each criterion.
Example
Session #4 covers SPL and SUP — 74 criteria assessed. Session #5 re-runs a small set; the latest findings replace the earlier ones and the rest of the report stays as it was.
Re-audit only what changed. The latest session per criterion counts; older sessions stay inspectable.
Framework Audits
Audit Report Dashboard
See how compliance evolves, run after run.
Objective
The dashboard is the home of a framework audit. It collects every run against a standard, summarizes ratings at every level, and tracks how compliance evolves over time.
Benefits
Trends, not snapshots. A historical chart shows how ratings move across runs — surface regressions and prove progress without rebuilding the picture each cycle.
Frozen, defensible history. Every past run stays preserved exactly as it was rated and reviewed.
One report, many runs. The latest run is current; older runs stay one click away for comparison.
Features
Top-line stats
Average rating, requirements covered, recommendation count — the health of the audit at a glance.
Drill-down rollup
A table of process groups with their ratings; click any row to dive deeper into the framework.
Audit sessions list
Every run shown as a card or list entry — view, download, or delete individual sessions.
Historical trend chart
Ratings plotted across versions so quality leaders see direction of travel, not just the current number.
Version tags
Label a run with a human-readable tag, and switch between current and historical versions in one click.
Report summary
Criteria coverage, criteria rating distribution, and recommendation counts consolidated in one place.
Framework Audits
Drill down to any requirement
Every level of the framework, every rating, in one view.
Objective
Let auditors move through the audit at every level of the framework hierarchy with ratings rolled up at each step. The picture stays clear no matter how deep they go.
Benefits
Find any requirement fast. Three clicks take an auditor from a top-line rating to a single requirement's evidence.
See where to focus. Rolled-up ratings at every level surface the weakest process groups immediately.
Stay oriented. Each level shows what it contains and how it scored — the bigger picture never disappears as you zoom in.
- Fully achieved
- Largely achieved
- Partially achieved
- Not achieved
Features
Process view
Average rating, requirement count, and a distribution of sub-process ratings — a heat map of where compliance is strong and where it is not.
Click-through navigation
Every row links to the next level down; breadcrumbs and the URL preserve the audit version, source and path.
Roll-up math, everywhere
Ratings aggregate from requirement to process to process group automatically, on every level.
Framework Audits
Evidence & explainability
Evidence, rationale and attributes — all in one place.
Objective
At the deepest level of every audit, the requirement detail view exposes everything behind a rating — supporting documents, AI rationale, attribute-level scoring and process outcomes.
Benefits
No black box. Every rating shows the documents that drove it, the AI's reasoning per document, and the attributes the requirement was scored against.
Defensible findings. Each piece of evidence is anchored to a specific Process Library version with traceable source text.
Faster verification. The system curates the most relevant documents and explains why each one matters.
Features
Key documents
Evidence the AI selected, ranked by relevance and labelled with a rating — each with a summary, the drivers behind the decision, identified weaknesses, and links back to the source text chunks.
Rating details
Attribute-level breakdown — every sub-criterion gets its own rating and explanation, not just a single overall score.
Add or remove evidence
Reviewers can pin additional documents with a note or remove ones the AI got wrong; user-added documents are clearly marked.
Criterion details
The criterion name and description straight from the standard, alongside the assessment.
Document mapping
Selection rationale and support level (decisive, strong, supporting) per mapped document.
Word export
Download the full requirement assessment as a formatted Word document.
Framework Audits
Review & override
Keep humans in control of every audit decision.
Objective
Every AI-generated finding can be reviewed, edited and published by a designated reviewer — turning AI output into auditable, accountable decisions with a complete trail from draft to published.
Benefits
Humans stay accountable. Every override is attributed to a reviewer, dated, and tracked separately from the AI's original output — the audit trail is the audit.
Findings become defensible. The draft, in-review and published lifecycle ensures that what leaves the platform has been deliberately approved.
Collaborate without confusion. Tasks assign reviewers, statuses signal who is working on what, and comments capture the discussion.
Features
Override anything
Reviewers can edit the rating, findings, attribute scores and key document selection — independently or all together.
Clear lifecycle
Drafts are editable, in-review entries are pending publication, published overrides are locked.
Original always preserved
AI output is never overwritten — overrides live alongside it, so reviewers and external auditors see what the system proposed and what a human decided.
Per-requirement comments
Threaded discussion attached to a requirement — or even a specific attribute — visible to everyone on the audit.
Run the standard you are measured against, against your own QMS.
Book a walkthrough